[ Upstream commit 9d4f8e54cef2c42e23ef258833dbd06a1eaff89b ] The test on whether rhashtable_insert_one did an insertion relies on the value returned by rhashtable_lookup_one. Unfortunately that value is overwritten after rhashtable_insert_one returns. Fix this by moving the test before data gets overwritten. Simplify the test as only data == NULL matters. Finally move atomic_inc back within the lock as otherwise it may be reordered with the atomic_dec on the removal side, potentially leading to an underflow. Reported-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Fixes: e1d3422c95f0 ("rhashtable: Fix potential deadlock by moving schedule_work outside lock") Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> Tested-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
30 KiB
30 KiB