Keith Randall dbaa2d3e65 cmd/compile: do nil check before calling duff functions, on arm64 and amd64 ...

On these platforms, we set up a frame pointer record below
the current stack pointer, so when we're in duffcopy or duffzero,
we get a reasonable traceback. See #73753.

But because this frame pointer record is below SP, it is vulnerable.
Anything that adds a new stack frame to the stack might clobber it.
Which actually happens in #73748 on amd64. I have not yet come across
a repro on arm64, but might as well be safe here.

The only real situation this could happen is when duffzero or duffcopy
is passed a nil pointer. So we can just avoid the problem by doing the
nil check outside duffzero/duffcopy. That way we never add a frame
below duffzero/duffcopy. (Most other ways to get a new frame below the
current one, like async preempt or debugger-generated calls, don't
apply to duffzero/duffcopy because they are runtime functions; we're
not allowed to preempt there.)

Longer term, we should stop putting stuff below SP. #73753 will
include that as part of its remit. But that's not for 1.25, so we'll
do the simple thing for 1.25 for this issue.

Fixes #73748

Change-Id: I913c49ee46dcaee8fb439415a4531f7b59d0f612
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/676916
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>

2025-05-28 20:35:09 -07:00

427 B

Raw Permalink Blame History

View Raw