1
0
This repository has been archived on 2024-07-22. You can view files and clone it, but cannot push or open issues or pull requests.
svn-openwrt-archive/target/linux/ipq806x/patches-3.18/135-clk-Avoid-sending-high-rates-to-downstream-clocks-during-set_rate.patch
John Crispin 8e49b4b902 ipq806x: add & enable cpufreq support
This change set enables frequency scaling on ipq806x, which speeds-up
the CPU and allows it to achieve its max frequency.

These patches are cherry-picked & backported from the following location:
*130-132: linux-next
*133-143: LKML - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/21/15
*144: derived from other qcom similar dts
*145: derived from https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.14/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-krait.c

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Olivari <mathieu@codeaurora.org>

SVN-Revision: 45730
2015-05-23 15:28:02 +00:00

130 lines
4.4 KiB
Diff

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [v3, 03/13] clk: Avoid sending high rates to downstream clocks during
set_rate
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
X-Patchwork-Id: 6063271
Message-Id: <1426920332-9340-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 23:45:22 -0700
If a clock is on and we call clk_set_rate() on it we may get into
a situation where the clock temporarily increases in rate
dramatically while we walk the tree and call .set_rate() ops. For
example, consider a case where a PLL feeds into a divider.
Initially the divider is set to divide by 1 and the PLL is
running fairly slow (100MHz). The downstream consumer of the
divider output can only handle rates =< 400 MHz, but the divider
can only choose between divisors of 1 and 4.
+-----+ +----------------+
| PLL |-->| div 1 or div 4 |---> consumer device
+-----+ +----------------+
To achieve a rate of 400MHz on the output of the divider, we
would have to set the rate of the PLL to 1.6 GHz and then divide
it by 4. The current code would set the PLL to 1.6GHz first while
the divider is still set to 1, thus causing the downstream
consumer of the clock to receive a few clock cycles of 1.6GHz
clock (far beyond it's maximum acceptable rate). We should be
changing the divider first before increasing the PLL rate to
avoid this problem.
Therefore, set the rate of any child clocks that are increasing
in rate from their current rate so that they can increase their
dividers if necessary. We assume that there isn't such a thing as
minimum rate requirements.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1476,21 +1476,23 @@ static struct clk *clk_propagate_rate_ch
* walk down a subtree and set the new rates notifying the rate
* change on the way
*/
-static void clk_change_rate(struct clk *clk)
+static void clk_change_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long best_parent_rate)
{
struct clk *child;
struct hlist_node *tmp;
unsigned long old_rate;
- unsigned long best_parent_rate = 0;
bool skip_set_rate = false;
struct clk *old_parent;
- old_rate = clk->rate;
+ hlist_for_each_entry(child, &clk->children, child_node) {
+ /* Skip children who will be reparented to another clock */
+ if (child->new_parent && child->new_parent != clk)
+ continue;
+ if (child->new_rate > child->rate)
+ clk_change_rate(child, clk->new_rate);
+ }
- if (clk->new_parent)
- best_parent_rate = clk->new_parent->rate;
- else if (clk->parent)
- best_parent_rate = clk->parent->rate;
+ old_rate = clk->rate;
if (clk->new_parent && clk->new_parent != clk->parent) {
old_parent = __clk_set_parent_before(clk, clk->new_parent);
@@ -1510,7 +1512,7 @@ static void clk_change_rate(struct clk *
if (!skip_set_rate && clk->ops->set_rate)
clk->ops->set_rate(clk->hw, clk->new_rate, best_parent_rate);
- clk->rate = clk_recalc(clk, best_parent_rate);
+ clk->rate = clk->new_rate;
if (clk->notifier_count && old_rate != clk->rate)
__clk_notify(clk, POST_RATE_CHANGE, old_rate, clk->rate);
@@ -1523,12 +1525,13 @@ static void clk_change_rate(struct clk *
/* Skip children who will be reparented to another clock */
if (child->new_parent && child->new_parent != clk)
continue;
- clk_change_rate(child);
+ if (child->new_rate != child->rate)
+ clk_change_rate(child, clk->new_rate);
}
/* handle the new child who might not be in clk->children yet */
- if (clk->new_child)
- clk_change_rate(clk->new_child);
+ if (clk->new_child && clk->new_child->new_rate != clk->new_child->rate)
+ clk_change_rate(clk->new_child, clk->new_rate);
}
/**
@@ -1556,6 +1559,7 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsign
{
struct clk *top, *fail_clk;
int ret = 0;
+ unsigned long parent_rate;
if (!clk)
return 0;
@@ -1589,8 +1593,13 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsign
goto out;
}
+ if (top->parent)
+ parent_rate = top->parent->rate;
+ else
+ parent_rate = 0;
+
/* change the rates */
- clk_change_rate(top);
+ clk_change_rate(top, parent_rate);
out:
clk_prepare_unlock();