0
0
mirror of https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/openwrt.git synced 2024-11-22 04:56:15 +00:00
openwrt/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-6.6/950-0384-media-bcm2835-unicam-Correctly-handle-FS-FE-ISR-cond.patch
Álvaro Fernández Rojas 8c405cdccc bcm27xx: add 6.6 kernel patches
The patches were generated from the RPi repo with the following command:
git format-patch v6.6.34..rpi-6.1.y

Some patches needed rebasing and, as usual, the applied and reverted, wireless
drivers, Github workflows, READMEs and defconfigs patches were removed.

Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
2024-06-18 18:52:49 +02:00

65 lines
2.4 KiB
Diff

From 9c7ea3de5ffea4240e97deaa376265d82eaacac1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 10:01:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 0384/1085] media: bcm2835-unicam: Correctly handle FS + FE ISR
condtion
If we get a simultaneous FS + FE interrupt for the same frame, it cannot be
marked as completed and returned to userland as the framebuffer will be refilled
by Unicam on the next sensor frame. Additionally, the timestamp will be set to 0
as the FS interrupt handling code will not have run yet.
To avoid these problems, the frame is considered dropped in the FE handler,
and will be returned to userland on the subsequent sensor frame.
Signed-off-by: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>
---
.../media/platform/bcm2835/bcm2835-unicam.c | 28 +++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/media/platform/bcm2835/bcm2835-unicam.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/bcm2835/bcm2835-unicam.c
@@ -919,7 +919,9 @@ static irqreturn_t unicam_isr(int irq, v
* to use.
*/
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(unicam->node); i++) {
- if (!unicam->node[i].streaming)
+ struct unicam_node *node = &unicam->node[i];
+
+ if (!node->streaming)
continue;
/*
@@ -929,14 +931,24 @@ static irqreturn_t unicam_isr(int irq, v
* + FS + LS). In this case, we cannot signal the buffer
* as complete, as the HW will reuse that buffer.
*/
- if (unicam->node[i].cur_frm &&
- unicam->node[i].cur_frm != unicam->node[i].next_frm) {
- unicam_process_buffer_complete(&unicam->node[i],
- sequence);
- unicam->node[i].cur_frm = unicam->node[i].next_frm;
- unicam->node[i].next_frm = NULL;
+ if (node->cur_frm && node->cur_frm != node->next_frm) {
+ /*
+ * This condition checks if FE + FS for the same
+ * frame has occurred. In such cases, we cannot
+ * return out the frame, as no buffer handling
+ * or timestamping has yet been done as part of
+ * the FS handler.
+ */
+ if (!node->cur_frm->vb.vb2_buf.timestamp) {
+ unicam_dbg(2, unicam, "ISR: FE without FS, dropping frame\n");
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ unicam_process_buffer_complete(node, sequence);
+ node->cur_frm = node->next_frm;
+ node->next_frm = NULL;
} else {
- unicam->node[i].cur_frm = unicam->node[i].next_frm;
+ node->cur_frm = node->next_frm;
}
}
unicam->sequence++;