openwrt/target/linux/generic/backport-6.6/895-06-v6.8-net-phylink-split-out-PHY-validation-from-phylink_br.patch
Robert Marko f04e377a50 generic: backport QCA808x possible interfaces fix
QCA808x does not currently fill in the possible_interfaces.

This leads to Phylink not being aware that it supports 2500Base-X as well
so in cases where it is connected to a DSA switch like MV88E6393 it will
limit that port to phy-mode set in the DTS.

That means that if SGMII is used you are limited to 1G only while if
2500Base-X was set you are limited to 2.5G only.

Populating the possible_interfaces fixes this, so lets backport the patches
from kernel 6.9.

This also includes a backport of the Phylink PHY validation series from
kernel 6.8 that allows the use of possible_interfaces.

Link: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/15765
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
2024-06-24 09:46:19 +02:00

96 lines
4.1 KiB
Diff

From ee0e0ddb910e7e989b65a19d72b6435baa641fc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 12:28:34 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] net: phylink: split out PHY validation from
phylink_bringup_phy()
When bringing up a PHY, we need to work out which ethtool link modes it
should support and advertise. Clause 22 PHYs operate in a single
interface mode, which can be easily dealt with. However, clause 45 PHYs
tend to switch interface mode depending on the media. We need more
flexible validation at this point, so this patch splits out that code
in preparation to changing it.
Tested-by: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/E1r6VIQ-00DDM9-LK@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
@@ -1775,6 +1775,35 @@ static void phylink_phy_change(struct ph
phylink_pause_to_str(pl->phy_state.pause));
}
+static int phylink_validate_phy(struct phylink *pl, struct phy_device *phy,
+ unsigned long *supported,
+ struct phylink_link_state *state)
+{
+ /* Check whether we would use rate matching for the proposed interface
+ * mode.
+ */
+ state->rate_matching = phy_get_rate_matching(phy, state->interface);
+
+ /* Clause 45 PHYs may switch their Serdes lane between, e.g. 10GBASE-R,
+ * 5GBASE-R, 2500BASE-X and SGMII if they are not using rate matching.
+ * For some interface modes (e.g. RXAUI, XAUI and USXGMII) switching
+ * their Serdes is either unnecessary or not reasonable.
+ *
+ * For these which switch interface modes, we really need to know which
+ * interface modes the PHY supports to properly work out which ethtool
+ * linkmodes can be supported. For now, as a work-around, we validate
+ * against all interface modes, which may lead to more ethtool link
+ * modes being advertised than are actually supported.
+ */
+ if (phy->is_c45 && state->rate_matching == RATE_MATCH_NONE &&
+ state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RXAUI &&
+ state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XAUI &&
+ state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII)
+ state->interface = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA;
+
+ return phylink_validate(pl, supported, state);
+}
+
static int phylink_bringup_phy(struct phylink *pl, struct phy_device *phy,
phy_interface_t interface)
{
@@ -1795,32 +1824,9 @@ static int phylink_bringup_phy(struct ph
memset(&config, 0, sizeof(config));
linkmode_copy(supported, phy->supported);
linkmode_copy(config.advertising, phy->advertising);
+ config.interface = interface;
- /* Check whether we would use rate matching for the proposed interface
- * mode.
- */
- config.rate_matching = phy_get_rate_matching(phy, interface);
-
- /* Clause 45 PHYs may switch their Serdes lane between, e.g. 10GBASE-R,
- * 5GBASE-R, 2500BASE-X and SGMII if they are not using rate matching.
- * For some interface modes (e.g. RXAUI, XAUI and USXGMII) switching
- * their Serdes is either unnecessary or not reasonable.
- *
- * For these which switch interface modes, we really need to know which
- * interface modes the PHY supports to properly work out which ethtool
- * linkmodes can be supported. For now, as a work-around, we validate
- * against all interface modes, which may lead to more ethtool link
- * modes being advertised than are actually supported.
- */
- if (phy->is_c45 && config.rate_matching == RATE_MATCH_NONE &&
- interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RXAUI &&
- interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XAUI &&
- interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII)
- config.interface = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA;
- else
- config.interface = interface;
-
- ret = phylink_validate(pl, supported, &config);
+ ret = phylink_validate_phy(pl, phy, supported, &config);
if (ret) {
phylink_warn(pl, "validation of %s with support %*pb and advertisement %*pb failed: %pe\n",
phy_modes(config.interface),